International Journal of Research Foundation of Hospital and Healthcare Administration

Register      Login

VOLUME 6 , ISSUE 2 ( July-December, 2018 ) > List of Articles

ORIGINAL RESEARCH

Financial Prudence of Healthcare Screening Program in Urban Set-up

Aditya Kumar, Saroj Kumar Patnaik, Madhav M Singh, Nishu Singh, Ashuthosh Sharma, Tapas Paul

Keywords : Cost-effectiveness, Healthcare, Screening program,Cost-benefit evaluation

Citation Information : Kumar A, Patnaik SK, Singh MM, Singh N, Sharma A, Paul T. Financial Prudence of Healthcare Screening Program in Urban Set-up. Int J Res Foundation Hosp Healthc Adm 2018; 6 (2):51-56.

DOI: 10.5005/jp-journals-10035-1091

License: CC BY-NC 4.0

Published Online: 00-12-2018

Copyright Statement:  Copyright © 2018; Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers (P) Ltd.


Abstract

Introduction: Health screening is one of the rapidly growing and accepted practice in healthcare setup across the globe. Public health screening programs are used to control epidemics of infectious disease and to target treatment for numerous chronic diseases. Methods: Duration of the study: The study was carried out from November 2018 to January 2019. Study setting: The study was carried out at Meerut. Study design: Traditional costing was done, and then a comparison was drawn to estimate the realistic costs incurred towards medical camp. Results: The cost of screening during the camp was INR 616 per person. With this cost, a large number of disorders were detected in an early stage which has the potential to develop in full-blown disease which may cause more cost to society at large. Hence this study recommends such screening program for families should be carried out on the frequent interval at least annually. Conclusion: Public health screening programs are used to control disease and to target treatment for acute or chronic diseases. Medical screening programs provide medical as well as socioeconomic benefits. Medical screening is a method for detecting disease or body dysfunction before an individual would normally seek medical care. The fundamental purpose of screening is early diagnosis and treatment of the individual and, thus, it has a clinical focus. Screening tests are generally administered to people who have not yet sought medical care, but at high risk for certain adverse health outcomes. This is a very cost-effective method of preventing the disease at an early stage. The study revealed the screening program is a very effective tool, as shown in this study.


PDF Share
  1. Berk ML, Schur C. Access to care: how much difference does Medicaid make? Health Affairs 1998;17:169-180.
  2. Reducing the Odds: Preventing Perinatal Transmission of HIV In The United States. Institute of Medicine (US) Committee on Perinatal Transmission of HIV; National Research Council (US) and Institute of Medicine (US) Board on Children, Youth, and Families; Stoto MA, Almario DA, McCormick MC, editors. Washington (DC): National Academies Press (US); 1999.
  3. Calleson DC, Seifer SD, Maurana C. Forces affecting community involvement of AHCs: perspectives of institutional and faculty leaders. Academic Medicine 2002;77(1):72-81.
  4. Glick M. The mouth is a mirror of the body. In Closing the Gap, a newsletter. July. Washington, DC: Office of Minority Health, Department of Health and Human Services. 1999.
  5. Kopans DB, Monsees B, Smith R, Feig S. Ten criteria for effective screening. AJR. American journal of roentgenology. 2002;178(2):508-510.
  6. US Preventive Services Task Force. Screening for prostate cancer: Recommendations and rationale. Am Fam Physician. 2003;67:787-792.
  7. Buviniæ M, Medici A, Fernández E, et al. Gender Differentials in Health. In: Jamison DT, Breman JG, Measham AR, et al., editors. Disease Control Priorities in Developing Countries.2nd edition. Washington (DC): The International Bank for Reconstruction and Development / The World Bank; 2006. Chapter 10. Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK11729/ Co-published by Oxford University Press, New York.
  8. World Bank. Global Burden of Disease and Risk Factors. New York: Oxford University Press. 2006.
  9. Joshi R, Cardona M, Iyengar S, Sukumar A, Raju CR, Raju KR, et al. Chronic diseases now a leading cause of death in rural India—mortality data from the Andhra Pradesh Rural Health Initiative. International journal of epidemiology. 2006;35(6):1522-1529.
  10. Gupta MD. Selective discrimination against female children in rural Punjab, India. Population and development review. 1987;13(1):77-100.
  11. Prabhakaran D, Jeemon P, Sharma M, Roth GA, Johnson C, Harikrishnan S, et al. The changing patterns of cardiovascular diseases and their risk factors in the states of India: the Global Burden of Disease Study 1990–2016. The Lancet Global Health. 2018;6(12):e1339-1351.
PDF Share

© Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers (P) LTD.