International Journal of Research Foundation of Hospital and Healthcare Administration

Register      Login

VOLUME 4 , ISSUE 2 ( July-December, 2016 ) > List of Articles

ORIGINAL ARTICLE

Incidence of Patient Identification Errors observed before Medication and Procedure/Intervention

Saakshi Kaushik, Ritwik Chawla,

Citation Information : Kaushik S, Chawla, R. Incidence of Patient Identification Errors observed before Medication and Procedure/Intervention. Int J Res Foundation Hosp Healthc Adm 2016; 4 (2):100-106.

DOI: 10.5005/jp-journals-10035-1066

License: CC BY 3.0

Published Online: 01-12-2016

Copyright Statement:  Copyright © 2016; Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers (P) Ltd.


Abstract

Objectives

To identify the number of individuals for whom double identification check was done before administering medication and before procedure/intervention, as per Continual Quality Improvement 3j indicator of National Accreditation Board of Hospitals (4th edition) and hospital policy.

Materials and methods

The study was a concurrent, observational recording of the study population which included doctors/surgeons, nurses, and/or technicians before administration of any medication and before beginning of any procedure/intervention. The observations were recorded on a prepared checklist to find the compliance of incidence of patients’ double identification.

Results

A total of 34 observations were recorded before administering medication to a patient. In 18 cases, wristbands were not being used, and identification details were incorrect in 4 cases. Of 34 cases, identifiers were illegible in 6 cases. The major area where the error was high was noncompliance to verbal confirmation of identity (ID) and checking it from the patient’s file. Out of 34 observations before a procedure/intervention, 9 errors were identified in cases where the ID band was not used for verification, and identification details on the band were illegible in 5 cases. In six cases, the patient’s name was not verbally confirmed with the patient or carer. Furthermore, in 10 cases, verbally confirmed name was not checked with the patient’s file. Out of 34 cases, double identification was not done in 13 cases.

Conclusion

Many nurses, doctors, and technicians in clinical settings do not verify patient ID before performing a task, resulting in more than one-third of staff not conforming themselves with the double identification procedure. The study also showed that over three-fourths of the total invasive procedures are compliant to double identification. On the contrary, noninvasive procedures showed less than one-fourth compliance to double identification.

How to cite this article

Chawla R, Kaushik S. Incidence of Patient Identification Errors observed before Medication and Procedure/Intervention. Int J Res Foundation Hosp Healthc Adm 2016;4(2):100-106.


  1. Patient identification. Patient Safety Solutions 2007;1(2):1-4.
  2. Patient misidentification in oncology care. Clin J Oncol Nurs 2008 Jun;12(3):495-498.
  3. Re-examining the requirements for verification of patient identifiers during medication administration: no wonder it is error-prone. IIE Trans Healthc Syst Eng 2013;3(4):280-291.
  4. To formulate a selective patient safety-related policy for a tertiary care hospital. Int J Res Foundation Hosp Healthc Adm 2014;2(2):94-102.
  5. London: Safer Practice Notice: Wristbands for hospital inpatients improves safety, National Patient Safety Agency; November 2005.
  6. Applying hierarchical task analysis to medication administration errors. Appl Ergon 200 Sep;37(5):669-679.
  7. Decreasing patient misidentification before chemotherapy administration. Clin J Oncol Nurs 2009;13(6):716-717.
  8. Accurate patient identification in the emergency department: Meeting the safety challenges. J Emerg Nurs 2012;38(4):364-367.
  9. Patient identification errors are common in a simulated setting. Ann Emerg Med 2010 Jun;55(6):503-509.
  10. Joint Commission National Patient Safety Goals, 2014. Topics Patient Saf 2014;14(1):1-4.
  11. Nurses’ behaviours and visual scanning patterns may reduce patient identification errors. J Exp Psychol Appl 2011 Sep;17(3):247-256.
PDF Share

© Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers (P) LTD.